Is this relevant to the charter? Do you doubt the attacks sufficiently that you would want to object to chartering a working group to address the issue?
Barry On Wed, Nov 9, 2022 at 4:54 PM Alessandro Vesely <ves...@tana.it> wrote: > > On Wed 09/Nov/2022 13:08:15 +0100 Barry Leiba wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > Current proposals include the following drafts: > > - draft-bradshaw-envelope-validation-extension-dkim > > - draft-chuang-replay-resistant-arc > > - draft-gondwana-email-mailpath > > - draft-kucherawy-dkim-anti-replay > > > > The working group will start by considering those proposals; other > > proposals remain welcome. > > > Isn't there a report on relevant replay attacks? All the above I-D say that > replay attacks are a problem. Bron adds that the attack was widely seen in > early 2022. However, there's not a panoramic view of the problem, mentioning > volume, scope, targets and such. > > I know replay attacks are possible, but I never saw one. > > > Best > Ale > -- > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf-dkim mailing list > Ietf-dkim@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim _______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list Ietf-dkim@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim
