On Sat, Dec 31, 2022 at 2:43 PM Dave Crocker <d...@dcrocker.net> wrote:
> The initial effort to form a working group in the IETF was pretty casual > and surfaced a lack of sufficient consensus among advocates. The IETF > said go away until there's more agreement. > > We went away for a year, during which we developed the original version > of DKIM, which demonstrated the coherence. > > The current effort has none of that existing critical mass of work and > agreement. This makes the effort quite a lot riskier. > > The fact that things are taking quite a few months doesn't help. > That's true. I'd forgotten this bit of the history. If we think this constraint is appropriate, I'm fine to include it. Does someone want to propose a sentence or two? I need to avoid getting my wrist slapped for both championing the charter and writing it. -MSK
_______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list Ietf-dkim@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim
