On February 4, 2023 5:20:27 PM UTC, Evan Burke <[email protected]> wrote: >On Sat, Feb 4, 2023 at 8:47 AM Dave Crocker <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 2/4/2023 8:41 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote: >> > I've yet to see a description of the problem that's distinguishable from >> a mailing list that preserves DKIM signatures. >> >> That seems like an especially healthy discussion to have. Focusing on, >> and seeking convergence about, the nature of the differences, could help >> consideration of the ways to counteract replay. >> > >In a word? Scale. Are there any mailing lists in existence that send tens >of millions of messages a day, or more, in a way that preserves the >original DKIM sig? How does that attribute relate to DKIM protocol changes? Scott K _______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim
- Re: [Ietf-dkim] Chartering update Tim Wicinski
- Re: [Ietf-dkim] Chartering update Michael Thomas
- Re: [Ietf-dkim] Chartering update Tim Wicinski
- Re: [Ietf-dkim] Chartering update Michael Thomas
- Re: [Ietf-dkim] Chartering update Scott Kitterman
- Re: [Ietf-dkim] Chartering updat... Michael Thomas
- Re: [Ietf-dkim] Chartering update Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [Ietf-dkim] Chartering updat... Scott Kitterman
- Re: [Ietf-dkim] Chartering updat... Dave Crocker
- Re: [Ietf-dkim] Chartering updat... Evan Burke
- Re: [Ietf-dkim] Chartering updat... Scott Kitterman
- Re: [Ietf-dkim] Chartering updat... Michael Thomas
- Re: [Ietf-dkim] Chartering updat... Evan Burke
- Re: [Ietf-dkim] Chartering updat... Michael Thomas
- Re: [Ietf-dkim] Chartering updat... Evan Burke
- Re: [Ietf-dkim] Chartering updat... Michael Thomas
- Re: [Ietf-dkim] Chartering updat... Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [Ietf-dkim] Chartering updat... Michael Thomas
