On Thu, Sep 7, 2023, at 11:42 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 9:38 PM Jesse Thompson <z...@fastmail.com> wrote: >> __ >> Is rfc6651 a lost cause? It looks like it defines a reporting mechanism in >> control of the signer, as opposed to the attacker. > > Has anyone (else) implemented it?
That's what I want to understand. Or, more specifically, if no one implemented it, why? And have those blockers changed due to the changed landscape with dkim replay, etc. Jesse
_______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list Ietf-dkim@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim