On Thu, Sep 7, 2023, at 11:42 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 9:38 PM Jesse Thompson <z...@fastmail.com> wrote:
>> __
>> Is rfc6651 a lost cause? It looks like it defines a reporting mechanism in 
>> control of the signer, as opposed to the attacker.
> 
> Has anyone (else) implemented it?

That's what I want to understand. Or, more specifically, if no one implemented 
it, why? And have those blockers changed due to the changed landscape with dkim 
replay, etc.

Jesse

_______________________________________________
Ietf-dkim mailing list
Ietf-dkim@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim

Reply via email to