On 6/3/2025 10:20 AM, Bron Gondwana wrote:
I still disagree that it's a bad name for the mean reasons that I've
stated earlier and will probably wind up stating again. I would
prefer to keep DKIM2 as the name.
To put things simply:
This is not an upgrade to DKIM. It is a replacement.
While it uses some components, it is an entirely different 'system'
design.
Re-using the name is frankly deceptive marketing.
And equally frankly, the main reason you gave, before, for wanting
to use it, is exactly because of brand awareness, not technical
relationship.
I believe you are in the rough in your belief that there needs to be
that goal.
I suggest you listen to the recording of the last meeting.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
bluesky: @dcrocker.bsky.social
mast: @[email protected]
_______________________________________________
Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
