On Tue, Jun 3, 2025 at 5:20 PM Tobias Herkula <tobias.herkula= [email protected]> wrote:
> Sure. > > > > Take the Porsche 911. Since 1967, there have been at least eight > fundamentally different generations, from air-cooled to water-cooled > engines, and from analog to digital systems, all under the same name. Every > version introduced major changes, yet the continuity of the name helped > preserve brand trust and accelerate acceptance. > > > > Yes, some purists argued "a water-cooled 911 isn’t a real 911," but that > never slowed adoption. The name bridged the gap between legacy and > innovation, making it easier for the ecosystem — customers, media, > engineers — to follow the evolution. > > > > Same principle applies here. "DKIM2" gives us continuity without locking > us into technical legacy. > > > > / Tobias Herkula > A nameplate on a vehicle != a technical standard from a technical standards body. It concerns me that an emphasis on "marketing" is being placed ahead of the technical standard design and details. Perhaps we should start a discussion of incorporating blockchain and AI so as to really improve the marketability of the effort. An associated memecoin would be even better. There are many things Dave and I might disagree on but this is not one of those things. I wholeheartedly agree with Dave that a name change is appropriate and necessary. The sooner the better. Michael Hammer.
_______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
