On Tue, Jun 3, 2025, at 14:03, Dave Crocker wrote:
> On 6/3/2025 1:37 PM, Tobias Herkula wrote:
>> Names drive adoption.
> 
> 
> Certitude implies experience.  
> 
> Please cite examples of re-using a name for an entirely different product and 
> a) getting 'faster' adoption, while b) having no blowback about deceptive 
> marketing.
> 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airbus_A220

Originally a Bombardier plane, purchased by Airbus and given a number which is 
remarkably similar to their other series of planes despite the different 
lineage, but filling the same basic purpose (a couple of pilots up the front, 
some cabin crew, a bunch of semi-comfortable seats, flies between airports).  
Most people flying in an A220 don't think "this isn't really an Airbus plane", 
and don't need to, because for them it does the thing they need.

DKIM2 is intended to fill a similar purpose (headers that you put on an email - 
probably using a software library, with some crypto and a public key in DNS, 
that helps assert that the controller of the associated private key sent the 
email) as DKIM.

Bron.

--
  Bron Gondwana, CEO, Fastmail Pty Ltd
  [email protected]

_______________________________________________
Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to