Dave, et al: On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 3:48 AM Dave Crocker <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2025, at 00:58, Dave Crocker wrote: > > On 6/18/2025 2:15 PM, Bron Gondwana wrote: > > But also, did a lot of thinking about how to support multiple RCPT-TO in a > single SMTP transaction. > > Simple question: Why? > > Simple answer - I spoke to someone from Microsoft about their Enterprise > architecture and the kind of mail usage patterns they see. > > So, extensive and convergent conversation in the decision-making forum for > a working group is overridden by an undocumented, private conversation one > person had with some other folk who are easily able to show up in the > forum, but haven't. > > Good to see that the working group process is functioning well. > While it does occur from time to time that one may find that the working group is not functioning as one would hope or expect, public admonitions of other participants wrapped in sarcasm are clearly more antagonistic than they are constructive. Please, as the chairs have pleaded previously, let's have more of the latter than the former. This is not the high ground. If you don't like how the group is operating, or if you think someone is acting in bad faith, your concerns should be raised to the chairs or the Area Director, preferably privately, and not (a) directly to each other, or (b) wrapped in caustic overtones. To be clear, although I'm citing only this recent example, we are aware of other participants that have also employed various forms of snark in their replies. We are addressing the group generally here. We will not hesitate in the future to apply our discretion under RFC 3934. There will be no further reminders. -MSK, for the Chair
_______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
