On Tue, 19 Aug 2025, Kai Engert wrote:
Quote from the current draft:
transporting multiple signatures over a single message. It is specified
initially for [OpenPGP], but can be easily extended to be used with [CMS] or
other signature formats."
I see how you could use it to wrap S/MIME (that's CMS) but I still don't
see how you would wrap DKIM in any way that makes sense.
I am not opposed in principle to unifying signatures, but so far all I've
seen is hand waving with a lot of confusion about how messages might be
wrapped or signed. The next step is for people who think it's useful to
write a draft describing the design. That's how the IETF works.
R's,
John
_______________________________________________
Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
