Hi, John. On 19 Aug 2025, at 18:30, John R Levine <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, 19 Aug 2025, Kai Engert wrote: >> >> Quote from the current draft: >> transporting multiple signatures over a single message. It is specified >> initially for [OpenPGP], but can be easily extended to be used with [CMS] or >> other signature formats." > > I see how you could use it to wrap S/MIME (that's CMS) but I still don't see > how you would wrap DKIM in any way that makes sense.
To be clear, neither do we. This proposal does not operate at the same level of the stack as DKIM, and it does not target the same problem space as DKIM. It does however sign over (a subset of) the data that DKIM signs over, which is where the suggestion for (partial) alignment arises. Thanks, Andrew. (FYI your MTA is rejecting connections from mine. RBL problems?) _______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
