On 27 Aug 2025, at 10:06, Dave Crocker wrote:
I think the convention that Pete described, for getting drafts to be
listed with the DKIM datatracker -- separate from the formal process
of adoption -- was to have the string 'dkim', not 'dkim2'.
So, finding the link to this draft required some effort.
Yes, the default convention IETF-wide is to use the WG acronym as the
datatracker always includes those in the "Related Internet-Drafts and
RFCs" list on the WG Documents page. Because we had quite a few
documents with "dkim2" in the name, I already added a filter to the DKIM
WG Documents list to catch those too. You can always find them at the
bottom of the page here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/dkim/documents/
pr
--
Pete Resnick https://www.episteme.net/
All connections to the world are tenuous at best
_______________________________________________
Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
