On Wed 27/Aug/2025 16:46:28 +0200 Richard Clayton wrote:
Title: DomainKeys Identified Mail Signatures v2 (DKIM2)
This draft is modelled on RFC 6376 and is intended to set out a formal
specification of DKIM2-Signature fields.
I found that document quite confusing to read. At one point I ran iddiff on
RFC 6376 and tried to read only the changes. It is still a pain to do.
Wouldn't readability improve if you assumed full familiarity with RFC 6376 and
focus on the differences? I understand that in the future people will want to
learn the current version of DKIM without having to wade through historical
artifacts. For now, however, leveraging people's knowledge of DKIM1 could be
an advantage.
Best
Ale
_______________________________________________
Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
