I'd like to break these into two points: 1. On whether to do rfc4871bis at all
I tend to agree with Tony that we should do a -bis to clean up the errata. If scoped as such it should be a very brief operation, taking no more than 6 months. 2. On whether to move to draft standard While I was initially in favor of this, I am now uncomfortable doing so, based on the lengthy debate we just concluded about errata. To me the changes made by the document we just approved were sufficient enough to warrant all manner of process. What's more, in that process we made some conceptual distinctions that I believe have not yet withstood the test of time. We are not ready for draft. I would recycle at proposed, if we are going to do anything at all. Eliot _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
