Tony Hansen wrote:
> I'm certainly ready to move forward with 4871bis. Yes, the protocol is
> ready to go to Draft Standard. No, we do not need another cycle at
> Proposed Standard. I think there's enough energy in the group to get
> 4871bis through.
>
> As to why bother, with 16 errata to pore through, I feel that it is much
> better to have one place to look for the technical spec instead of 17
> documents.
Maybe somebody can clarify whether you can roll errata from a PS and
go directly to draft. I gather from Eliot that you can't (?). Going
to draft is certainly a lot more palatable than another unproductive
romp through PS.
Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
