On Apr 28, 2010, at 2:11 PM, John R. Levine wrote: >> >> Your proposal that MLM remove Signatures would cause restrictive >> policies to fail.
Which is why I oppose this proposal. > Indeed. I'm assuming that any list that paid attention to ADSP would sign > its outgoing mail and would expect its recipients to trust it enough to > whitelist the list's mail. That's quite an assumption. I would not make that same assumption as we chart out new/better mechanisms for MLM's to handle DKIM-signed mail. It will be true in some cases, and false in others. All for valid reasons we should seek to account for. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
