On 04/29/2010 10:23 AM, Al Iverson wrote: > On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 11:58 AM, McDowell, Brett<[email protected]> > wrote: >> On Apr 28, 2010, at 2:11 PM, John R. Levine wrote: >> >>>> >>>> Your proposal that MLM remove Signatures would cause restrictive >>>> policies to fail. >> >> Which is why I oppose this proposal. > > As John Levine mentioned previously, your own posts to this list fail > authentication and end up in many of our spam folders because of > Paypal's SPF policy. I'm not against strong authentication policies -- > but I'm wondering how you personally expect to be able to post to > mailing lists without acceptance of this proposal? The status quo > interferes with your ability currently, and broader adoption of > authentication on the receiving side will only make it worse.
The solution to a misconfigured SPF/ADSP record is for every receiver to patch it up post-hoc? That makes absolutely no sense. Mike _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
