On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 11:58 AM, McDowell, Brett <bmcdow...@paypal.com> wrote: > On Apr 28, 2010, at 2:11 PM, John R. Levine wrote: > >>> >>> Your proposal that MLM remove Signatures would cause restrictive >>> policies to fail. > > Which is why I oppose this proposal.
As John Levine mentioned previously, your own posts to this list fail authentication and end up in many of our spam folders because of Paypal's SPF policy. I'm not against strong authentication policies -- but I'm wondering how you personally expect to be able to post to mailing lists without acceptance of this proposal? The status quo interferes with your ability currently, and broader adoption of authentication on the receiving side will only make it worse. Apologies if this is off-topic, not germane to the broader discussion. But this question has been nagging at me strongly these past few days. Regards, Al Iverson _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html