On 04/29/2010 01:12 PM, SM wrote: > At 11:12 29-04-10, Michael Thomas wrote: >> With respect to DKIM, anybody who filters based on broken signatures without >> any (or little) other input pretty much deserves the false positive >> rate they're >> complaining about. > > This mailing list removes the DKIM signature of the poster. An ADSP > policy of "all" means that all mail from the domain is signed with an > Author Domain Signature (d= tag). As there isn't a valid DKIM > signature, the message can get rejected. > > If the ADSP policy is "discardable" and there isn't an Author Domain > Signature, the mail can be discarded, i.e. you don't even want a rejection. > > If this mailing list did not remove the DKIM signature, the receivers > would still get an invalid signature as the mailing list modifies the > subject line and adds a footer. The ADSP policy will be interpreted as above.
Note that I didn't say anything about ADSP in what I wrote. ADSP discardable is a *lot* of "other input", IMO. Mike _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
