> Perhaps they are, but there could be some value in trying to define a set of > reversible list modifications which would permit DKIM signatures to still be > useful. That's not to mandate those modifications, or to forbid others, but > as guidance. It could be a way forward.
Sounds like another job for ASRG. First you'd need to see if you could characterize a meaningful set of lists, not just the ones you and I happen to be subscribed to. R's, John _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
