--On 30 April 2010 12:37:22 +0000 John Levine <jo...@iecc.com> wrote:
>> Then the recipient has some evidence to assist in his evaluation. In >> fact, the changes made by this list are easily reversible, if someone >> wants to try to reverse them and check the original signature. But he >> cannot do that with a signature that has been removed. > > Huh? If we could write down the changes that lists make to the mail > they send, we would have done so. My list managers have been known to > remove or reorder MIME parts and flatten HTML into text. I even run > some quaint lists where the editor hand-edits the messages. No, those > aren't "illegitimate", they're standard practice and have been for > decades. > > R's, > John Perhaps they are, but there could be some value in trying to define a set of reversible list modifications which would permit DKIM signatures to still be useful. That's not to mandate those modifications, or to forbid others, but as guidance. It could be a way forward. -- Ian Eiloart IT Services, University of Sussex 01273-873148 x3148 For new support requests, see http://www.sussex.ac.uk/its/help/ _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
