On Jul 30, 2010, at 12:26 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim- >> boun...@mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of Steve Atkins >> Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 8:56 PM >> To: DKIM List >> Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Alternative MAiling List Approach >> >> On Jul 29, 2010, at 3:45 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: >>> >>> Should the MLM draft suggest From: replacement and addition of Reply- >> To: as a specific example of DKIM-friendly MLM behavior? >> >> No. DKIM doesn't really say much about either the From: address or the >> Reply-To: address, so such a suggestion for "DKIM-friendly" behaviour >> would be nonsensical. >> >> It might be a reasonable suggestion for the benefit of other protocols, >> but that's a different question. > > Is it not an ADSP issue though? Covering ADSP issues is (at least > implicitly) in scope for this document.
It may well be an ADSP issue - I've not looked in detail at the proposal - and it may be in scope for this document. (I suspect it's also a bad idea, but that's a separate discussion). It's definitely not a DKIM issue, though, and any labeling of a non-DKIM issue as "DKIM-friendly" would be misleading. Cheers, Steve _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
