> -----Original Message----- > From: ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim- > boun...@mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of Steve Atkins > Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 8:56 PM > To: DKIM List > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Alternative MAiling List Approach > > On Jul 29, 2010, at 3:45 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > > > > Should the MLM draft suggest From: replacement and addition of Reply- > To: as a specific example of DKIM-friendly MLM behavior? > > No. DKIM doesn't really say much about either the From: address or the > Reply-To: address, so such a suggestion for "DKIM-friendly" behaviour > would be nonsensical. > > It might be a reasonable suggestion for the benefit of other protocols, > but that's a different question.
Is it not an ADSP issue though? Covering ADSP issues is (at least implicitly) in scope for this document. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
