On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 6:22 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy <m...@cloudmark.com> wrote: > Some offlist feedback I wanted to bounce to the list to gauge consensus: > > > > a) Section 5.1 currently advocates a warning to new subscribers to an MLM > with a highly restrictive ADSP policy. Should this be stronger, such as “a > warning is advised, and full denial should be considered”?
+1 > c) A “-1” to the idea of altering From: to cope with ADSP; the reason given: > “This presumes endpoints will understand a DKIM-related From:-altered > message.” I must of missed that point in Daniel's thread. I hadn't realized that the From would of been conditionally re-written. Today, endpoints (I take that to mean MUAs), don't seem to have a standard way of dealing with mailing lists anyway. So I'd say -1 to the reason. -- Jeff Macdonald Ayer, MA _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
