On Monday, August 02, 2010 02:13:39 pm Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim- > > boun...@mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Macdonald > > Sent: Monday, August 02, 2010 10:53 AM > > To: DKIM List > > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Feedback on draft-ietf-dkim-mailinglists for > > discussion > > > > > c) A "-1" to the idea of altering From: to cope with ADSP; the reason > > > > given: > > > "This presumes endpoints will understand a DKIM-related From:-altered > > > message." > > > > I must of missed that point in Daniel's thread. I hadn't realized that > > the From would of been conditionally re-written. Today, endpoints (I > > take that to mean MUAs), don't seem to have a standard way of dealing > > with mailing lists anyway. So I'd say -1 to the reason. > > I don't think there's anything conditional about it. The suggestion is to > rewrite From: when the MLM remails its modified content. > > It sounds like you're saying that's a good idea. By my count that's three > in favour and two against, and I suspect that's not rough consensus in > either direction, but is probably enough to add some discussion about it > to the draft, unless of course there's objection to even mentioning the > idea.
I think this is worth considering. In discussions with one of the developers of a major open source MLM, he mentioned to me that they've had feature requests over the years to alter From due to privacy/spambot harvesting reasons, so this isn't something that would only serve to mitigate damage due to ADSP. Scott K _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
