> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org] 
> On Behalf Of Dave CROCKER
> Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 5:10 AM
> To: IETF DKIM WG
> Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Last call comment: Changing the g= definition
> 
> On 10/13/2010 1:52 PM, Jim Fenton wrote:
> > I propose removing section 3.6.1.1 in its entirety.
> 
> Not only do I support this, but I think we can remove all references to
> DomainKeys, except for the obvious historical reference to its role as
> input to DKIM.

+1

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

Reply via email to