> -----Original Message----- > From: ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org] > On Behalf Of Dave CROCKER > Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 5:10 AM > To: IETF DKIM WG > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Last call comment: Changing the g= definition > > On 10/13/2010 1:52 PM, Jim Fenton wrote: > > I propose removing section 3.6.1.1 in its entirety. > > Not only do I support this, but I think we can remove all references to > DomainKeys, except for the obvious historical reference to its role as > input to DKIM.
+1 _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html