On Oct 14, 2010, at 5:09 AM, Dave CROCKER wrote: > On 10/13/2010 1:52 PM, Jim Fenton wrote: >> I propose removing section 3.6.1.1 in its entirety. > > Not only do I support this, but I think we can remove all references to > DomainKeys, except for the obvious historical reference to its role as input > to > DKIM. > > At the time DKIM was developed, worrying about compatibility with, and > transition from, DomainKeys was essential. Now it isn't.
+1 We've done a surprisingly good job of getting the word out that DK is over and DKIM is the future. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
