On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 18:06:14 +0100, Murray S. Kucherawy <m...@cloudmark.com> wrote:
>> -----Original Message----- >> From: ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org >> [mailto:ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of John Levine >> Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 7:14 PM >> To: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org >> Cc: dcroc...@bbiw.net >> Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 3.6.2.1 - Working with other TXT records >> >> By the way, has everyone tested their signing code to see what happens >> if there's no From: header at all? Do we even agree what the right >> thing is? I'd think it'd be approximately the same as if the private >> signing key (the only other mandatory input I can think of at the >> moment) wasn't present. > > OpenDKIM returns a syntax error in both cases. And to complete the picture, what does it do when verifying? -- Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------ Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl Email: ...@clerew.man.ac.uk snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K. PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5 _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html