> -----Original Message----- > From: ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org] > On Behalf Of Charles Lindsey > Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 3:52 AM > To: DKIM > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 3.6.2.1 - Working with other TXT > records > > >> By the way, has everyone tested their signing code to see what happens > >> if there's no From: header at all? Do we even agree what the right > >> thing is? I'd think it'd be approximately the same as if the private > >> signing key (the only other mandatory input I can think of at the > >> moment) wasn't present. > > > > OpenDKIM returns a syntax error in both cases. > > And to complete the picture, what does it do when verifying?
I'm not sure what you think "both" meant, but I meant it as "when signing and when verifying". I don't know of any other DKIM operating modes. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
