On Sat, 16 Oct 2010 05:09:53 +0100, Hector Santos <hsan...@isdg.net> wrote:
> This probably means that it should clarified what that 5.4 sentence > means and also the next section 5.5 > > 5.5. Recommended Signature Content > > .. > > The following header fields SHOULD be included in the signature, if > they are present in the message being signed: > > o From (REQUIRED in all signatures) > But that is weaker what what it already says, which implies saying "h=from" even if NO from is (contrary t0 5322) present. -- Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------ Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl Email: ...@clerew.man.ac.uk snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K. PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5 _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
