John Levine wrote: > By the way, has everyone tested their signing code to see what happens > if there's no From: header at all? Do we even agree what the right > thing is? I'd think it'd be approximately the same as if the private > signing key (the only other mandatory input I can think of at the > moment) wasn't present.
For our DKIM implementation, it will fail to sign and fail to verify. -- Hector Santos, CTO http://www.santronics.com http://santronics.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
