It would have been nice to get this *before* working group last call
ended, or even before it started.
Murray, use your judgment on how to handle these, and we can get other
input on any that aren't straighforward.
Barry, as chair
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 12:31 AM, Franck Martin <fmar...@linkedin.com> wrote:
> Sorry if I jump in, some comments:
>
> 4.3 it would be nice to talk about message encoding change like QP->8bits,
> may be in minor or major body changes. It is a minor change for the human
> but major for the machines as many characters got changed.
>
> 5.1 "Some mail filtering software incorrectly penalizes a message
> containing a DKIM signature that fails verification." You should
> remind/add that a message that fails DKIM must be considered like having
> no signature at all. Then you can bring ADSP, policy in the picture, and
> there ADSP too will not make the difference if a message has no signature
> or a failed signature. I have the feeling that making the point clears
> helps in building message policies (out of scope of this document).
>
> "such as a signing and author subdomain {DKIM 12}" -> "such as a signing
> and author subdomain {DKIM 12} or a totally different domain"
>
>
> 5.2 There are some professional services that allows to look in to
> reception at some providers
>
> 5.3 postmaster should inform their users that messages are likely to be
> discarded if sent via a MLM.
>
> 6.8 talk about headers to add to the message but do not talk which
> recommended headers should be signed. They are specified in DKIM 5.5 but
> would be nice to do a reminder here specific to MLM.
>
> Speaking of DKIM 5.5, List- headers are recommended to be signed, but
> doesn't it creates confusion? My feel is that they should be signed only
> if present in the message, if they are not present DKIM should not mention
> them in h= at all.
>
> On 5/7/11 6:30 , "internet-dra...@ietf.org" <internet-dra...@ietf.org>
> wrote:
>
>>draft-ietf-dkim-mailinglists-08
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
> http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
>
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
