On 20 May 2011, at 05:24, Hector Santos wrote: > > In this case, if this is enforced with a MUST, for a system that is > not 8BITMIME ready but is adding DKIM signing support, to remain > compliant it is far more feasible to add a rule to a DKIM signing > component: > > If mail is 8bit then SKIP signing.
But why skip? Usually the message won't be downgraded. And even if they are, usually a broken signature will cause no harm. -- Ian Eiloart Postmaster, University of Sussex +44 (0) 1273 87-3148 _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
