On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 07:43:36AM -0400, John Leslie wrote: > "Bounce" in the name is problemmatic because folks sometimes refer > to an error _during_ the SMTP connection as a "bounce". This, IMHO, > is just plain wrong; but perhaps we have already lost that battle...
perhaps 'inline-bounce' is better? Or 'inband-bounce'? I've heard of both from my MTA vendor. -- :: Jeff Macdonald | Director of Messaging Technologies :: e-Dialog | [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: 131 Hartwell Ave. | Lexington, MA 02421 :: v: 781-372-1922 | f: 781-863-8118 :: www.e-dialog.com
