Re: Missing ABNF terms in 2821bis?

[John C Klensin]

--On Monday, 15 October, 2007 16:32 -0700 Douglas Otis
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> John,
> 
> Is there a reason for including obsolete definitions for
> General-address-literal?

Is there any particularly reason why you think they are obsolete?

>  The 2821bis declares dcontent only defined in RFC2822?

I can't parse this sentence sufficiently to figure out what you
are asking

   john