Jeff Macdonald wrote: > perhaps 'inline-bounce' is better? Or 'inband-bounce'? I've heard of > both from my MTA vendor.
"Bounce" has yet another meaning. I believe Mutt refers to redirecting e-mail as "bouncing" it. In other words, if mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] comes in to [EMAIL PROTECTED], Bob can "bounce" it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and it appears to come from [EMAIL PROTECTED] I think we should avoid "bounce" completely. We should say "reject with an SMTP failure code" and "generate a failure notification message" because those phrases are unambiguous. Regards, David.
