> Specific processes can be and almost always are identified by a port number. uh, no. IP address + port number often works, but port number alone never works. and FQDN + port number doesn't work nearly as well as IP address + port number, because there are too many cases where there are multiple IP addresses associated with an FQDN.
- Re: To address or NAT to... Randy Bush
- Re: To address or NAT to... David R. Conrad
- Re: To address or NAT to... Bill Manning
- Re: To address or NAT to add... Steve Deering
- DNS performance (Re: To address or NAT to... Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: DNS performance (Re: To address o... Christian Huitema
- Re: To address or NAT to address? Jeffrey Altman
- Re: To address or NAT to address? David R. Conrad
- Re: To address or NAT to address? Pyda Srisuresh
- RE: To address or NAT to address? Dan Kohn
- RE: To address or NAT to address? Keith Moore
- RE: To address or NAT to address? Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: To address or NAT to address? Pyda Srisuresh
- Re: To address or NAT to address? Brian E Carpenter
- Re: To address or NAT to address? Walt Lazear