At 17:30 01.12.99 -0800, Dan Kohn wrote: >Specific processes can be and almost always are identified by a port number. >Just as TCP connections are identified as a 4-tuple of sender and receiver >IP address and port number, an application layer session would be identified >by a 4-tuple of sender and receiver FQDN and port. Don't forget that NAT changes port numbers too. (Most NAT boxes are Portmapper NATs.) Harald A -- Harald Tveit Alvestrand, EDB Maxware, Norway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: To address or NAT to... David R. Conrad
- Re: To address or NAT to... Bill Manning
- Re: To address or NAT to add... Steve Deering
- DNS performance (Re: To address or NAT to... Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: DNS performance (Re: To address o... Christian Huitema
- Re: To address or NAT to address? Jeffrey Altman
- Re: To address or NAT to address? David R. Conrad
- Re: To address or NAT to address? Pyda Srisuresh
- RE: To address or NAT to address? Dan Kohn
- Re: To address or NAT to address? Keith Moore
- Re: To address or NAT to address? Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: To address or NAT to address? Pyda Srisuresh
- Re: To address or NAT to address? Brian E Carpenter
- Re: To address or NAT to address? Walt Lazear