Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt

[Matt Holdrege]

>I don't know about you, but it scares me to read the various forecasts
>about how wireless will transform the landscape over the next few
>years. E.g., more wireless phones with internet connectivity than
>PCs. The numbers are just staggering and the associated demand for
>addresses will be astonishing. We ain't seen nothing yet.

It seems to be a given now that 3G phones will be IPv6 (at least outside 
the U.S.) when they roll out over the next few years. But we should make 
people clearly aware of what to expect when they NAT their way back to the 
IPv4 Internet or IPv4 intranets. That is one of the purposes of this draft. 
(oh yeah, this thread is supposed to be about contributing to the draft in 
the subject line)