At 21.43 -0400 00-07-10, Keith Moore wrote: >not bloody likely. some things are inexcusable. munging data in >transit is one of them. the fact that you may have a business >model that says you can make money doing something that is inexcusable >is not a justification for doing that thing. I don't see any problems people making money on weird NAT-munging-weirdo-webonly-wap things which they sell to customers, BUT, it is NOT Internet access. I would not buy it, because I want Internet access. What I oppose strongly, is that people sell weird stuff and call it Internet. paf
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-0... Matt Holdrege
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complicati... Masataka Ohta
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-compli... vinton g. cerf
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-co... Masataka Ohta
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protoco... Jon Crowcroft
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protoco... Masataka Ohta
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protoco... Jon Crowcroft
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protoco... Masataka Ohta
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protoco... Randy Bush
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protoco... Keith Moore
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protoco... Patrik Fältström
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protoco... Keith Moore
- RE: draft-ietf-nat-protoco... aboba
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protoco... Masataka Ohta
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protoco... Keith Moore
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protoco... Masataka Ohta
- RE: draft-ietf-nat-protoco... Brijesh Kumar
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protoco... Peter Deutsch in Mountain View
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protoco... Keith Moore
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protoco... Randy Bush
- RE: draft-ietf-nat-protoco... mark.paton