At 4:16 PM -0400 6/21/00, Brijesh Kumar wrote: >WAP's goal is not to replace IP, but mediate between non-IP wireless >devices, and existing IP based wire line applications. There are no "IP based wire line applications". Applications based on IP don't depend on, or know, or care that their packets flow over wires or fibres or RF waves or IR waves or wet string, or any combination thereof. That's one of the neat things about IP. Steve
- RE: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP) Taylor, Johnny
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WA... Keith Moore
- RE: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Rejec... Brijesh Kumar
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- R... John Stracke
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- R... Keith Moore
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- R... Mark Atwood
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- R... Steve Deering
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap ... Bill Manning
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A ... Patrik Fältström
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP I... Patrik Fältström
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: W... Magnus Danielson
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A ... John Stracke
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP I... Magnus Danielson
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: W... Masataka Ohta
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A ... Matt Crawford
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP I... Chuck Kaekel
- RE: IP over MIME (was Re: W... Brijesh Kumar