>> WAP's goal is not to replace IP, but mediate between non-IP wireless >> devices, and existing IP based wire line applications. > So then obvious the Right Thing is to put an IP stack on each of those > devices. Then such "mediation" is unnecessary. but there may not be enough room in the 640k before one runs into the video buffer. :-) technical shortsightedness used as an excuse for an attempt to create a monpolistic walled garden. don't get too excited about it, other more ipish mobile phone technologies are already passing wap. don't you just love telephants? randy
- RE: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP) Taylor, Johnny
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WA... Keith Moore
- RE: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Rejec... Brijesh Kumar
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- R... John Stracke
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- R... Keith Moore
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- R... Mark Atwood
- RE: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- R... Steve Deering
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap ... Bill Manning
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A ... Patrik Fältström
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP I... Patrik Fältström
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: W... Magnus Danielson
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A ... John Stracke
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP I... Magnus Danielson
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: W... Masataka Ohta
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A ... Matt Crawford