At 13.37 +0200 00-06-22, Magnus Danielson wrote: > > 1926 An Experimental Encapsulation of IP Datagrams on Top of ATM. J. >> Eriksson. April 1996. (Format: TXT=2969 bytes) (Status: >> INFORMATIONAL) > >I still havent found a working implementation of this. Any references? >Did the channel selection ever get automated? I know that Peter Deutch at then Bunyip was working on a slightly different, but similar, proposal which was to run IP over a string. I guess that if he is on this list, he can explain. paf
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP) Keith Moore
- RE: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WA... Brijesh Kumar
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Rejec... John Stracke
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Rejec... Keith Moore
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Rejec... Mark Atwood
- RE: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Rejec... Steve Deering
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- R... Bill Manning
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap ... Patrik Fältström
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A ... Patrik Fältström
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP I... Magnus Danielson
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap ... John Stracke
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A ... Magnus Danielson
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP I... Masataka Ohta
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap ... Matt Crawford
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A ... Chuck Kaekel
- RE: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP I... Brijesh Kumar
- RE: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP I... Mahadevan Iyer
- RE: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap ... Bob Wise
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP) Eric Brunner