> Did the IESG depricate IP over Avian Carrier when I blinked? > And the draft on IP over seismic waves is due any day now. Consider the possibilities of a neutrino beam -- no media costs and lower latency than direct point-to-point fiber. http://www-numi.fnal.gov:8875/overview/overview.html http://www.hep.anl.gov/ndk/postscript/numil337_3.pdf (page 5) http://www-numi.fnal.gov:8875/fnal_minos/physics/Superposition1.html http://www.hep.umn.edu/minos/images.html
- RE: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Re... Steve Deering
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -... Bill Manning
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Tr... Patrik Fältström
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is... Patrik Fältström
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WA... Magnus Danielson
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Tr... John Stracke
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is... Magnus Danielson
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WA... Masataka Ohta
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Tr... Matt Crawford
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is... Chuck Kaekel
- RE: IP over MIME (was Re: WA... Brijesh Kumar
- RE: IP over MIME (was Re: WA... Mahadevan Iyer
- RE: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Tr... Bob Wise
- Re: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP) Eric Brunner
- RE: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP) Parkinson, Jonathan
- RE: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP) Lee John-W15376
- RE: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP) Dan Kohn
- RE: IP over MIME (was Re: WAP Is A Trap -- Reject WAP) Taylor, Johnny