> If IETF makes it clear that AOL is not an ISP, it will commercially > motivate AOL to be an ISP. probably not. folks who subscribe to AOL aren't likely to be reading IETF documents. face it, it's not the superior quality of AOL's service that keeps AOLers from moving - it's their susceptibility to marketing BS and their addiction to chat rooms. it's hard to help those people. Keith
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protoco... Jon Crowcroft
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protoco... Masataka Ohta
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protoco... Jon Crowcroft
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protoco... Masataka Ohta
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protoco... Randy Bush
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protoco... Keith Moore
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protoco... Patrik Fältström
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protoco... Keith Moore
- RE: draft-ietf-nat-protoco... aboba
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protoco... Masataka Ohta
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protoco... Keith Moore
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protoco... Masataka Ohta
- RE: draft-ietf-nat-protoco... Brijesh Kumar
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protoco... Peter Deutsch in Mountain View
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protoco... Keith Moore
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protoco... Randy Bush
- RE: draft-ietf-nat-protoco... mark.paton
- RE: draft-ietf-nat-protoco... Randy Bush
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protoco... Keith Moore
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protoco... Masataka Ohta
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-0... Eliot Lear