On Thu, 03 Aug 2000 12:57:49 EDT, "Book, Robert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Vinton's idea has much merit. A scheme to allocate blocks of addresses to > manufacturers would be much easier to support than an organization > attempting to process individual email requests, or CGI scripted forms from > a webpage, or a world-wide DHCP server for Amana ( and one for Maytag, etc.) > to register a refrigerator. And easier administration should translate into You don't want to assign network addresses on a per-manufacturer basis. Network addresses have to be aggregable. That's why we have ARP because MAC addresses on an Ehternet are assigned per manufacturer. But that's OK, because IPv6 has ARP ;) -- Valdis Kletnieks Operating Systems Analyst Virginia Tech
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Bob Hinden
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Anthony Atkielski
- RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Dawson, Peter D
- RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Rick H Wesson
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Anthony Atkielski
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Steve Deering
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh m... Anthony Atkielski
- RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Book, Robert
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! John Stracke
- RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! John Day
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! vinton g. cerf
- Address allocation revisited Anthony Atkielski
- Re: Address allocation revisited Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: Address allocation revisited Anthony Atkielski
- Re: Address allocation revisited Robert Elz
- Re: Address allocation revisited John Day
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Jim_Stephenson-Dunn
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Keith Moore
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Dennis Glatting
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh m... Mahadevan Iyer