Robert Book writes: > Vinton's idea has much merit. A scheme to allocate blocks > of addresses to manufacturers would be much easier to > support ... No. This will only accelerate the exhaustion of IPv6.
- RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Dawson, Peter D
- RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Rick H Wesson
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Anthony Atkielski
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Steve Deering
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh m... Anthony Atkielski
- RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Book, Robert
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! John Stracke
- RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! John Day
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! vinton g. cerf
- Re: Address allocation revisited Anthony Atkielski
- Re: Address allocation revisited Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: Address allocation revisited Anthony Atkielski
- Re: Address allocation revisited Robert Elz
- Re: Address allocation revisited John Day
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Jim_Stephenson-Dunn
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Keith Moore
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my! Dennis Glatting
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh m... Mahadevan Iyer
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- ... Dennis Glatting
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- ... Anthony Atkielski
