> I would suggest that chairs try setting the agenda around issues, not
> around drafts themselves. The main point of the face-to-face meetings
> is to resolve issues that cannot be resolved by mail. Put those on the
> agenda, and let the combatants present as much tutorial information as
> they feel is necessary to make their point -- but don't set up the
> editor of a particular draft to give a presentation first, followed by
> discussion. Don't even put the draft title on the agenda, just in the
> preliminary mail sent out before the meeting. Thoughts?
sounds good to me!
randy
