a nightmare it seems to me v At 02:39 PM 1/20/2001 -0800, Bernard D. Aboba wrote: >What is worth thinking about is what this will imply for the future >internet architecture. It is one thing to address issues brought up by a >single well functioning NAT within the same administrative domain. It is >another thing to deal with multiple layers of perhaps not so well >implemented NATs which may not even support tunneling of IPv6. >And that is where we appear to be headed over the next few years.
- Number of Firewall/NAT Users Jiri Kuthan
- RE: Number of Firewall/NAT Users Bernard Aboba
- Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users Bill Manning
- RE: Number of Firewall/NAT Users vint cerf
- RE: Number of Firewall/NAT Users Bernard D. Aboba
- Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users vint cerf
- Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users Jim McMurry
- Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users Keith Moore
- Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users J. Noel Chiappa
- Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users Ed Gerck
- Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users Matt Holdrege
- RE: Number of Firewall/NAT Users Richard Shockey
- Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users Keith Moore
- Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users Keith Moore