On Sat, 20 Jan 2001 21:32:35 EST, Richard Shockey said: > The Net as we know is has always been application driven. SMTP, HTTP, FTP > etc. These applications can transverse NAT's but real forms of streaming > media cannot. OK.. I'll admit that streaming stuff isn't my strong point, and I'm down with the flu to boot, so my clue level is pretty low here.. but... Is it SIP that cannot work across a NAT, or is there a generic reason that *no* streaming-media protocol can work across a NAT? Valdis Kletnieks Operating Systems Analyst Virginia Tech
- RE: Number of Firewall/NAT Users vint cerf
- RE: Number of Firewall/NAT Users Bernard D. Aboba
- RE: Number of Firewall/NAT Users vint cerf
- Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users Jim McMurry
- Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users Keith Moore
- Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users J. Noel Chiappa
- Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users Ed Gerck
- Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users Matt Holdrege
- RE: Number of Firewall/NAT Users Richard Shockey
- Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users Keith Moore
- Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users Keith Moore
- Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users Keith Moore
- Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users Joel Jaeggli
- Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users Daniel Senie
- Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users Matt Holdrege
- Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users Daniel Senie
- Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users Keith Moore
- Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users Matt Holdrege