> Then it seems we will have to create an ever expanding bandwidth to support > all the overhead associated with NAT and these multiple layers. bandwidth consumption is the least of the problems. actually NATs probably conserve bandwidth because they prevent many kinds of new applications from being deployed. Keith
- Number of Firewall/NAT Users Jiri Kuthan
- RE: Number of Firewall/NAT Users Bernard Aboba
- Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users Bill Manning
- RE: Number of Firewall/NAT Users vint cerf
- RE: Number of Firewall/NAT Users Bernard D. Aboba
- RE: Number of Firewall/NAT Users vint cerf
- Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users Jim McMurry
- Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users Keith Moore
- Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users J. Noel Chiappa
- Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users Ed Gerck
- Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users Matt Holdrege
- RE: Number of Firewall/NAT Users Richard Shockey
- Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users Keith Moore
- Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users Keith Moore
- Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users Keith Moore
- Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users Valdis . Kletnieks